If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

There seems to be a misconception about offshore asset protection in that its legality seems to be questioned. Some people even ask if the concept is sleazy. Despite all the myths that surround the topic, it is a viable way to protect your assets should you ever be facing litigation. For a few years towards the end of the 1990’s, offshore asset protection was synonymous with offshore planning. Offshore banks, mutual funds, and trust funds were sprouting up like weeds, and offshore tax/debtor havens were booming.

The potential of losing personal or business assets to a creditor or due to a judgment is the premise behind incorporating an asset protection system. It is the underlying principle of asset protection planning.

The assets cannot be legally seized and/or sold due to a change in their character occurring from the asset protection strategy. It is recommended that you inquire about the criteria and obligations involved with offshore asset protection, as well as hiring the services of an attorney for any and all legal questions that may arise.

Despite the fact that it isn’t always the way the scenario transpires, asset protection strategies need to be put into motion before the need for it becomes apparent. Interestingly enough, you can still engage in an asset protection plan even if creditors have filed suit. Unfortunately, when asset protection plans are enacted at this point, they are perceived as fraudulent acts, even though this is not the case. There is usually no downside to asset protection planning. Simple stated, planning protects the assets.

In the United States today, there are numerous asset protection planning strategies that an individual or business can employ based on their particular circumstances and needs. The nature of the asset to be protected (such as bank accounts, personal residences, rental real estate, and retirement plans) will determine the system that is best for the specific party. The best asset protection strategy can also be determined by the timing of a claim or lawsuit. The strategy may also include ways to offset the creditor’s aggressiveness as well as the risk adversity of the debtor.

From a business ownership standpoint, there are benefits of offshore asset protection as well, especially for the internet entrepreneur (a vastly growing segment). Forming your corporation offshore is no more costly or time-consuming than forming your corporation within your own country’s jurisdiction. For handling all of your online credit card transactions, the individual who conducts business online has the option of creating what is referred to as merchant account.

This is the best way to handle all of your online transactions because it is very safe and secure. Additionally, it is usually more difficult to procure a domestic merchant account versus the offshore one, especially if you are offering information or products and/or services online. There are also the tax benefits. Taxes typically eat away at your assets. Offshore tax deferral and tax reduction are among the top reasons why a person sets up offshore asset protection and/or an offshore corporate account.

The above are a few of the key reasons behind pursuing offshore asset protection, but there are others that you can investigate. Your personal requirements and situation will mandate the different options that need to be included in your personal plan.